Going in to Love & Mercy, I admit that I knew very little about Brian Wilson. A founding member of the Beach Boys, I knew that he suffered from a mental illness and was the father of Wendy and Carney Wilson, of Wilson Phillips fame, who just happened to be one of my favorite bands as a teenager. That was it. That was the extent of my knowledge on this musical legend.
Holy crap, was I blown away by this film! I mean seriously, you have to check out this movie, if for nothing else than to get a sense of who Brian Wilson was and is. The film consists of two simultaneous stories, one taking place in the 1960's during the Beach Boys heyday and one taking place during a tumultuous time in his life during the 1980's.
Paul Dano is incredible as a young Brian Wilson. We're talking awards season calibre performance here, which I am scared is going to get lost in the shuffle as the year goes on. Not that Dano doesn't shine in everything he does, but here he really, truly does. His performance is understated and yet, at the same time, completely over the top, which I know doesn't make a lot of sense, but will once you see this film. He brings such heart to the character that you can't help but root for him, even when you know that maybe he's not on the right path.
John Cusack is just as fantastic as an older Brian Wilson, at the height of his struggle with mental illness. His performance is truly heart wrenching, in both its scope and subtlety. Another performance that I hope is going to be remembered come awards season, although again, I'm not holding my breath. Elizabeth Banks shines as Melinda Ledbetter, the woman who eventually saves Wilson and Paul Giamatti does what he does best as the creepy Dr. Eugene Landy. Seriously, the cast and their performances are amazing, and definitely worth the price of admission.
Overall the film is an interesting look at an interesting man and the trials and tribulations that make him who he is today. I recommend the film, not only for the unforgettable performance of Paul Dano, but also for the look into the psyche of a musical icon. I came out knowing a whole lot more about Brian Wilson and with a newfound respect for everything that he's accomplished in his life. He is someone who should be celebrated for his musical genius and the best way to do that is to go out and see this film.
Love & Mercy 4.75/5
Thoughts and opinions on pop-culture, movies, TV, comic books, novels and anything else that strikes my fancy. Sometimes thoughtful, sometimes insightful, always random... but never boring! Welcome to my world... as scary as that prospect might be...
Thursday, 11 June 2015
I Spy Hilarity! My Review Of Paul Feig's SPY...
Say what you will, but when Melissa McCarthy teams up with
Paul Feig, it’s comedy gold! For whatever reason, these two just get each other
and it shows in everything they do together, usually bringing the laughs by the
bucketful. And Spy is no exception.
What I liked about this film was both the chemistry of the
cast and the fact that McCarthy isn't doing her regular old schtick. Sure,
there are pratfalls and physical comedy throughout, but it’s different this
time because McCarthy’s Susan Cooper isn't a one note character, bumbling
through life and bordering on idiotic. She’s smart and capable and I really
think that McCarthy shines when she’s playing these types of characters. (Those
that are similar to the character she plays on Mike & Molly!). I hope she embraces these types of roles and
just goes for it in the future. Not everyone of her characters needs to be a
moron to be funny.
And seriously, Rose Byrne needs to do more comedy! Between
this and last year’s hit, Neighbours,
she more than proves that she’s not only sexy, but funny as hell. Of course,
she also needs to play more bad guys because she’s just so good at it. Jude Law
is great as the suave, but clueless James Bond knockoff, but was a bit underused
in the film overall. Miranda Hart and Peter Serafinowicz are absolutely
hilarious as a couple of CIA agents to round out the supporting cast. But let’s
face it, Jason Statham absolutely steals the show in this one! His take on the
macho, stereotypical secret agent is delightful and shows that the action star
has great comedic timing, as well as no problem making fun of himself and the
genre.
Overall, I had a great time with this film. I found myself
laughing out loud on a number of occasions, and even if the plot was slightly
generic, it was a great riff on the spy genre as a whole. I am actually going
to say that I hope they make a sequel to this film, as I would love another opportunity
to catch up with these characters and see what else they have in store for us.
Another mission, anyone?
Spy 4/5
Monday, 1 June 2015
What’s The Hawaiian Word For Disappointing? My Review Of Aloha…
Why, Cameron, why? That’s what continued to run through my
brain as I exited the theatre this weekend after screening Cameron Crowe’s
latest, Aloha. How could everything, that looked so amazing on paper, have gone
so horribly, horribly wrong? But sadly, it did.
I really wanted to love this movie, because I love Cameron
Crowe. I think that, for the most part, he’s an amazing filmmaker and I’m
always interested in whatever he’s doing next. And yes, I am one of those
people who really liked Elizabethtown and I will totally defend it against all
of you naysayers! Was it perfect? No, but it was at least watchable, unlike his newest, Aloha.
This film suffers from an acute identity crisis. Is it a
romantic comedy? A family drama? An international spy thriller? I honestly
don’t think anyone, least of all Cameron Crowe, knows because this film tries
to be all of these things and ends up a jumbled mess. The 3 story arcs that
make up the plot of the film have absolutely nothing to do with one another,
other than the fact that they are meant to show the growth of Bradley Cooper’s
character, and honestly, by the time we get to the end, no one really cares.
Now, there are things to like about this film. First and
foremost, the cast is amazing. It’s such a shame that they are utterly wasted
in a forgettable film. Bradley Cooper has made a career playing the flawed hero
and here, he doesn’t disappoint. While his character isn’t exceptionally well
fleshed out, he brings enough to it that you kind of want to see him win. Emma
Stone is fantastic, as always, as the neurotic, but likeable love interest. Her
character would have benefited from a bit more fleshing out as well, although
overall, this is a small quibble as she does get plenty of screen time. I think
her character fell victim to a brutal final edit. Rachel McAdams shines in what
little she is given, but honestly, John Krasinki steals the show in an
understated and subtle, yet highly memorable performance.
Ultimately, this film just tries too hard, and ultimately
crashes and burns. I think that if Crowe had eliminated one of the story arcs
(those that have seen the film probably know which one I’m talking about) and
focused on the other two, this would have been a pretty special film. There are
touches of that Cameron Crowe brilliance, including the final scene of the film
which is so stunning and heartfelt it will bring a tear to your eye, but
overall it just doesn’t work. And I really, really, really wanted it to work.
When the first thought out of your head is, I wonder what someone like David O.
Russell could have done with this film, you know you’re in trouble.
Aloha 2/5
The Future Isn't So Bright! Review: Tomorrowland
I hate it when one of my most anticipated films of the year
ends up being a dud. And this year, that appears to be the case in a number of
instances. I was excited for this film. I love Brad Bird and think that he’s an
amazing filmmaker. I was looking forward to seeing what he had in store for
us. I mean, the man turned down a Star Wars film to make Tomorrowland, so it
had to be something special, right?
Yeah, not so much! That’s not to say that the film is bad,
because it’s not. It’s just that it is not what I (or a number of others, I'm
sure) thought it was going to be. The marketing for the film was interesting
and promised something special. What we got was a pretty generic Disney film, through and
through, fully aimed at a family/younger audience. And that’s not a bad thing…
it was just completely unexpected.
Visually, the film is lovely. The actual shots of Tomorrowland
itself were amazing, and I would expect nothing less from Bird. And the cast
does a great job with what they are given. I had heard rumblings that many
thought George Clooney was miscast, but I don't see it. I thought that he
did a good job and his character had a nice little story arc that came full circle. Britt Robertson was pretty dynamic as the lead and I look forward to seeing what she has in
store for us next. For me, however, the show was completely stolen by Raffey
Cassidy. Her turn as Athena is fantastic and worth the price of admission
alone. A bright spot in an otherwise uneven story.
Aside from the fact that it wasn't what I
expected, the film suffers from a weak script, especially in the third act. A
film that could have been revolutionary felt kind of generic, hitting all the same beats and tropes as any other family film. The villain was weak and the macguffin was so contrived it was almost laughable.
Everything was set up so that it could all be explained in the allotted 2 hours, whether
it truly made sense in the grand scheme of things or not.
Overall, the film was a letdown for me, mainly because I
think I had such high expectations going in and I really wanted to love it. The
probably 12 year old girls who were also in my screening, absolutely loved the
film and couldn't stop gushing about it, so apparently I'm not the demographic.
If Disney had marketed the film properly, as the family friendly film that it
is, they might have seen a slightly better box office draw. As it is, the film
will go down as a pretty big disappointment to many. At least this
means that Brad Bird can turn his focus to things that matter, like The
Incredibles 2.
Tomorrowland 3/5
Monday, 25 May 2015
What A Lovely Day, Indeed! Review: Mad Max: Fury Road
Who would have thought that one of the most violent, yet
visually stunning action films ever created would also have such an
interesting, feminist voice?
I’m going to start off by saying that this review is going to
be slightly spoilery. I am trying to make my reviews as spoiler free as
possible, but with this film, it’s just not going to work. This film needs to
be discussed… so, you've been warned! And really, if you haven't seen it yet,
you absolutely should!
I will admit, going into this film, I really didn't know
much about it. Sure, I had seen the trailers (which were amazing!), but
honestly, they really weren't all that informative when it came to plot... and
that’s okay. I don't need everything spelled out for me in a trailer. It has been
years (decades?) since I've seen the original films, so I was unsure if that
would make a difference or not. Believe me, it didn’t.
While his name is on the title card and Max is there
physically, he takes a back seat the strong women in this film. And, I'm okay
with that. Tom Hardy has a presence on screen that is undeniable, so his just
being there adds so much, even though his character doesn't utter more than a
handful of words throughout the entirety film. I am serious when I say that I
would pay to watch Hardy read the phone book, because he is just so incredible.
This is another multi-layered performance for Hardy, who is quickly becoming a
chameleon, able to seamlessly become every character he portrays.
I really liked Nicholas Hoult’s turn as Nux, as well. I think that Hoult is a really good actor and I am glad that he is branching out and choosing roles that are interesting and innovative. Hoult brought a subtlety and vulnerability to a character that could have very easily been one-dimensional, and it was interesting to see his development over the course of the film. From bad guy zealot to sacrificing hero over the course of two hours is hard to pull off, but Hoult does it with such heart that it’s completely believable.
But this film really is Charlize Theron’s. Rumors that
Furiosa was the star of this film were absolutely true and she utterly shines.
Her turn as this amazing character has us all clamouring for a film of her own
and I wouldn't be surprised to see it happen. But she wasn't the only one to
stand out in this film. The five wives, whose lives made up the main story arc
of the plot, were all exceptional (as were the women from the Green Place). It's great to see strong women taking action and deciding to change the course of their lives. Far too often female characters spend their time needing to be rescued, especially
in big action set pieces, so the change of pace feels revelatory… which it
shouldn’t and is actually quite sad, but that’s a discussion for another day. In a film whose marketing campaign was all about carnage, it was surprising (in such a good way!) to see the main plot of the film revolve around women no longer content with being considered objects and actually doing something about it. Hopefully it will once again show the powers that be that, if done right, gender and age don't mean a thing when it comes to audience engagement. (I'm not holding my breath, however!)
Of course, no discussion of this film would be complete
without discussing the visuals. Miller and his team went above and
beyond when it came to this film, and it shows. His reliance on practical
effects and stunts place this film head and shoulders above the rest. It’s
visually stunning and mind blowingly over the top and probably one of the best
action movies ever made. Note to everyone out there; this is how you do an
action movie! (Are you listening Michael Bay?) Through the mayhem and carnage,
I was never at a loss as to what was going on, nor was I ever confuse as to
what I was looking at or how it happened. The chaos was orchestrated like a
beautiful symphony, right down the crescendo at the end. It was visceral, dark
and glorious. Kudos to George Miller for bringing his vision to life and for not letting it get hijacked and turned into what the studio wanted it to be.
I highly recommend that you check it out, preferably on the big
screen, where you can bask in its awesomeness. I cannot wait to check out both
the black and white and silent cuts of the film that are rumoured to be on the
Blu-Ray release, later this year. What a lovely day!
Mad Max: Fury Road 4.75/5
Friday, 22 May 2015
Better Late Than Never! My Review Of The Avengers: Age Of Ultron...
So, this review is going to contain spoilers for Age Of
Ultron. I figure, if you haven't seen the film by now, you probably aren't
going to, and if you're still reading, then you don’t care if you're spoiled.
Either way, you have been warned…
I think that, going in, everyone’s expectations for The
Avengers: Age Of Ultron were sky-high. The first film was amazing in both its
scope and execution. The result of careful planning and a making sure all of
the pieces were exactly where they needed to be. Sure, the idea looked great on
paper, but how would it work in the real world? Just getting it to the screen
was a feat in and of itself. The fact that the movie was great was just icing
on the cake. But how was the studio going to top it?
According to a lot of people, they couldn't and frankly, didn’t.
But I really do think that’s an unfair assessment. I get the idea that you need
to compare it to something, especially since it’s the second film in a
franchise, but I don't think it’s fair to compare it to the original. As I
stated, the original was special, for many reasons, the main one being that it
was the first of its kind. Never before had a franchise brought together and
used its various characters in such a way. Ultimately, it was a fan boy’s wet
dream. The Avengers, together, on the screen, at the same time. The problem is,
by the time that AoU was released, it had become old hat. There was no shock
and awe at seeing Thor and Captain America working together to defeat evil. No deep
seated need to watch Tony Stark and Bruce Banner brainstorm. Been there, done
that, got the t-shirt.
Ultimately, I think that a lot of folks got caught up in the
comparisons, and found AoU lacking. Is it because it’s not as good? Possibly,
although I would beg to differ. I think that most of it stems from the fact
that people have placed the first Avengers film on a pedestal and are using its
heightened esteem as an excuse. Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love The
Avengers. I just don't think it’s the perfect movie that others are making it
out to be, all in an attempt to pull down the Age Of Ultron. I also think that
many people are looking for any excuse to bring the juggernaut down, so they
latched on to the ‘flaws’ of the film and ran with it, head first.
While I don't think that the film is perfect, I will
absolutely admit to loving it. I have seen it twice now and actually found I
enjoyed even more the second time. One of the more vocal issues that folks had
with the film was the pacing. I didn't have a problem with it, with the
exception of the whole Thor storyline. I thought that his part of the story,
which was necessary in order to move the overall story arcs for Ragnarok and
The Infinity War forward, was rushed and choppy and really didn’t make a whole
lot of sense. I think that even five more minutes and a little exposition would
have gone a long way in making it fit into the story a little more seamlessly.
(Rumor has it that originally it was supposed to be Tom Hiddleston’s Loki in
Thor’s dreamlike sequence, which I think would have had a lot more impact,
especially since Thor thinks his brother is dead). Let’s hope that the rumors
of an extended cut on Blu-Ray come to fruition and these scene makes more sense
within the scope of the film.
The other issue that folks seemed to have with the film was
Ultron himself. Many have complained that he wasn't menacing enough, or that he
was too comical. And I get that. (Marvel has always struggled with their
villains and I've even wrote an article at my other ‘job’ about it, which you
can check out here!) Ultimately, he wasn't what I expected either, but I'm okay
with that, because he was still amazing, as was James Spader’s portrayal of
him. I think one of the things that people failed to understand is that he is
nothing more than a petulant child. Out to prove that he is better than and at
the same time, nothing like his ‘father,’ Tony Stark. They also didn't seem to
get his motivations. (Really, she asked, incredulously? Why wouldn't a trip
through the interwebz lead to the decision that we all need to be exterminated?
Have you seen some of the stuff that’s out there?) Again, we're not dealing
with a fully formed being here. Add to that the fact that he’s immature,
volatile and extremely powerful and the Ultron we saw on the screen is the perfect
interpretation of the character. Although Vision actually uses the phrase he was born
yesterday in the film, most people seem to forget that Ultron really isn't that much
older.
What I did love about the film was the character development
of characters that, until now, haven't had the opportunity to shine. I thought the
whole Hawkeye story was lovely. I loved the fact that he had this secret life,
including a pregnant wife and kids, which no one, with the exception of
Natasha, was privy to. The idea brought the character to life for me and I
couldn't be happier that Marvel decided to go this way. One of the things that
fascinated me in the first film was the dynamic between Natasha and Clint. One
of my favorite scenes is the one after Natasha performs her 'cognitive recalibration' on him and they briefly hint at their pasts and relationship. It always made
me curious, and itching for an origin story for the two of them. Now, more
than ever, I would love to see that happen.
Of course, I can't discuss the film without discussing the
newcomers. I think that Elizabeth Olsen and Aaron Taylor-Johnson did a
fantastic job of bringing The Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver to life. (Yes, I do
think that Quicksilver in DOFP was amazing, but again, I don't think it’s fair
to compare as the character was used in two completely different ways in each
of the films!) Unfortunately, I had Quicksilver’s death spoiled for me (that’s
what I get for reading comments!) so it was slightly less shocking, but
nonetheless impactful. In a world where we were all convinced Hawkeye was going
to die, it was surprising to see someone else sacrifice themselves for him,
especially given everything that was at stake. While there have been rumblings
that Marvel doesn't have to keep him dead, I think they will, if only
because his death makes The Scarlet Witch a more interesting character. And
then, there was Vision… What can I say other than what an amazing introduction of
such an iconic character. Paul Bettany’s portrayal was spot on and I cannot
wait to see more from him. My big fear, however, is that Thanos is going to be
forced to rip the mind gem out of his head in order to complete his matching
set, which would absolutely not be good! Of course, the Mad Titan with a full
set of gems in the Infinity Gauntlet isn't good either… and I can't wait to see
how it all plays out on screen.
A lot of folks really didn't like the Bruce Banner-Natasha Romanoff relationship and found it forced. Personally, it didn't feel forced to me and I understand Natasha's reasons for find Bruce attractive. Everything in her life has been aggressive and violent, so why wouldn't she seek out the one man who wants nothing more than calm and serene in his life? And no, I have no issue with Betty, because it was pretty obvious at the end of The Incredible Hulk that their relationship was over. And don't get me started on the whole 'monster' controversy! She called herself a monster because she's a trained assassin with red in her ledger, people, not because she couldn't have children. Get your heads out of your asses and think, please!
Also on first viewing, I didn't think there was enough conflict
between Tony and Steve leading up to next year's Civil War, something that I was
really looking forward to, but I've changed my mind. The fight they have just
before Vision is brought to life is pretty knock-down-drag-out. There is
definitely something there, no matter how chummy they seemed at the end and I
can't wait to see how it all plays out. Yes, I get how some people think it’s
hard to care about the stakes, when you know what the plan is for the next 5
years. To them I say, does the end game really matter? Isn't it the journey
that’s the exciting part? Just sit back and enjoy the ride. Marvel has now
proved, with the death of Quicksilver, that they have no problem changing the
game when they need to and I have no doubt they will, provided that it serves the overall story.
Overall, I really liked this film. I think that, with the
exception of a few minor issues, it accomplished what it set out to do. It was
bigger and bolder than the first, while still telling its own story. Mission accomplished. It moved the MCU forward without compromising (for the
most part, anyway) the plot, but still managed to hint at enough to keep even the
most casual fan interested. While I don't think that comic book movies need to
be dumbed down or should just be considered popcorn flicks, I also don't think
they need to explain all the mysteries of the universe, either. As long as a
good time is had, that’s all that counts. And I definitely had a good time. (I
am also counting down the days to the Blu-Ray release so that I can own it and
watch it anytime I want!)
The Avengers: Age Of Ultron 4.5/5
Labels:
Black Widow,
Clint Barton,
Hawkeye,
Joss Whedon,
Kevin Feige,
Marvel,
Quicksilver,
Scarlet Witch,
Steve Rogers,
The Avengers,
The Avengers: Age Of Ultron,
The Hulk,
Thor,
Tony Stark,
Ultron
Thursday, 21 May 2015
They're Back, Pitches! and So Am I! My Review Of PITCH PERFECT 2!
Yes, I know that it’s been a while. Almost a year in fact,
since my last set of posts… and a lot has happened in the last year. I started
writing for SchmoesKnow.com, which I love, but it has taken up a lot of my free
time. (Please, stop by and check it out! Lots of great stuff over there, and
some pretty fantastic people, to boot!) That, coupled with my full-time job and
the novels that I am currently writing… well, something had to give.
Unfortunately, it was my blog! But I’m back now, hoping to eke out some time to
review the things that I love (or maybe don’t!) and talk about the news that
interests me. Let’s see how long it lasts!
And now, as promised, on to the good stuff…
Back in 2012, I went into my screening of Pitch Perfect
expecting nothing but fluff. And that’s okay, because sometimes, fluff is good…
and in this case, great. The film was charming and funny and full of heart. And
it surprised a lot of people. The film made $115 million at the box office, on
a $17 million budget, prompting Universal Pictures to greenlight a sequel. But
could the sequel hit all the same notes?
The short answer is, no. While I enjoyed the film, I felt
that it was somehow missing that something special that captivated me about the
first one. (Now, I will full admit that it may be because I had high
expectations for this film). The studio brought back the original cast of the
film to reprise their roles, while adding Hailee Steinfeld and a criminally
underused Katey Sagal to the mix (I mean, seriously, have you heard the woman
sing? She’s incredible!), but were still unable to capture that same magic. The
music is fantastic, however, and it’s really worth the price of admission to
see the cameo by the Green Bay Packers. Very amusing!
The best character in the film is definitely Rebel Wilson’s
Fat Amy. She’s a bonafide scene stealer, and I couldn’t stop laughing during
one particular scene where her character gets to do a hilarious solo. She’s got
impeccable comic timing and I for one miss her short lived show, Super Fun
Night. Yes, I realize that I am probably the only one, but oh, well! I enjoyed
the addition of Hailee Steinfeld’s Emily Junk and think that the studio made an
excellent choice to continue the franchise. (Because yes, the studio will
continue the franchise… the film has made $121 million dollars in the 5 days
since its release). One of my favorite films of last year was Begin Again and
Steinfeld was a big reason for that. I am excited to see what she brings to
this franchise.
Overall, I had a good time with this film. I just think
that, for me, it wasn’t able to live up to the awesomeness that was first film.
That often happens with sequels. While I don’t think that this film suffered
too much by sequelitis, it was a bit of a let-down none the less. A nice
addition to the budding franchise, although if the studio chooses not to make
another (like that’s going to happen!), I wouldn’t lose any sleep over it.
Pitch Perfect 2 3.5/5
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)